Blog

Peaceful Existence Part IV


Starting your Custody Case

 

          If you are married, and no divorce has been filed, then one of the first questions that you need to ask yourself is: Do I want to start my case in Supreme Court or Family Court?  

          By way of background, Supreme Court is the court where divorces take place.  In Family Court, you can file for custody, but you cannot get a divorce or divide property there.

          A major difference between a Supreme Court divorce case and a Family Court custody case is as follows.   When people get a divorce, you usually have one judge deciding custody, child support, maintenance (alimony or spousal support), and equitable distribution (how assets and debts will be divided).  In a Family Court case, the judge deciding your custody case will only be deciding custody, and nothing else.  (You can also start proceedings in Family Court for spousal and child support.   Those cases are heard by a different jurist, called a “Support Magistrate.”)

          What does this mean for you?  Let’s say that your family has only some assets.  For example, you may rent an apartment and have a small 401K.  If you file for divorce and you’re fighting over custody while your 401K is on the table, your ex may take a harder stance about your 401K because of the custody fight.  Therefore, in a case like this, it may be a good strategy to go to Family Court, take care of custody, and then take care of division of assets, and your divorce, in Supreme Court after the Family Court custody case is over. 

          Furthermore, the issue of timing is important.  The process for filing is different between the two courts.  

In Family Court, you file a petition, where you provide basic information and explain why you should get custody.   Once that is filed, you will get a summons (a paper directed to your ex stating that he or she must appear), with a court date.  Unfortunately, your court date will be months away.  Therefore, if your case needs immediate attention, then it is likely best to file it first in Supreme Court.  An example is if your ex has taken your children out of your home and is not permitting you to have contact with them. (In some cases, you can file something in Family Court called a writ of habeas corpus, where you seek an order directing your ex to bring the children to court so you can get them back into your care.  However, some judges take a position that they cannot issue a writ unless the person filing it  already has an order of custody, and the other side takes the children away anyway.)

          In Supreme Court, you file what is called a summons with notice or a summons with complaint, which starts the process.  If your case needs immediate attention, then you can file a Request for Judicial Intervention (RJI), and an order to show cause, which is paperwork explaining why your case requires emergency attention and why you should get what you need.  For example, you can ask for immediate temporary custody, explaining that your ex left the home with the children and is not permitting you to contact them.   These applications are usually addressed quickly.

          One circumstance where the Family Court commonly addresses custody issues quickly is where there is a family offense proceeding, or a request for an order of protection.  This involves cases where there are allegations of domestic violence, abuse, and neglect.  If you are filing a custody case where you have faced domestic violence from your ex, and/or your children faced abuse or neglect, you can file a request for an order of protection against your ex along with your custody case, and your case will usually be heard quickly.   If there is proof that the children are in danger, then the Court will move quickly. 

          If you are in a position where your ex has already filed a divorce case in Supreme Court, then you cannot just file a case in Family Court while the Supreme Court case is pending.   If you do that, then the Family Court will be dismissed.  However, you can ask the Supreme Court to refer (send) the custody part of the divorce to Family Court.

          A competent and experienced family law attorney is critical to this process.  This can be an emotional process and having an experienced attorney helping you through this challenging legal matter will take some of the stress off you. Whether you are seeking custody in Family Court or Supreme Court, experience and expertise is critical to making sure that your story is presented effectively to the judge so you can get a result that is in your favor, and most importantly, in the best interests of your children.


Recommended Posts

Peaceful Existence Part III

Communication with the Other Parent During a Custody Case In almost any custody trial, a significant amount of e-mails, text messages, and/or social media messages are entered into evidence. Even though we always hope to avoid a custody trial, it is critical to plan for it.   This means pretending that the judge is copied on all communications between you and your ex.  Don’t send any messages, whether via text, e-mail, or social media platform, that you would not want the judge to see when your custody case is decided. In almost every case, you will have to communicate with your ex regarding your children, both while you are going to court and after the case is over.  These communications will involve giving your ex a heads up that you hit traffic while on the way to pick up the children, planning your children’s birthday parties, coordinating homework assignments/school projects, etc. Remember to always be respectful when communicating with your ex, the less drama there is, the better for everyone involved. If your ex is frustrating you, reach out to your attorney and allow your attorney to relay this information to your ex’s attorney. It is important to remain composed even during times that are difficult and emotional. In ideal situations, while you are not together as a couple anymore, you will be able to communicate freely via whatever platforms that you are used to, whether that be telephone, text message, or social media messenger.  However, in some cases, this is not possible. Where there are serious communication issues, make sure that all communication is in writing, and save all of it in a secure location. There are even apps that parents in high conflict custody cases use to communicate.  They include Talking Parents and Our Family Wizard.   Some of these apps even include, as an option, a warning that the tone in the communications can be considered antagonistic, so that the parent can soften it before sending it.  Our Family Wizard even has a feature allowing parents to upload calendars and school and medical reports. These apps can be helpful because there is a record kept of the communications, this way nothing is lost and can be used as reference if needed. Most importantly, the courts place a high degree of importance on your ability to shield the children from arguments.  There should be no arguing with your ex on devices that the children use, no naming your ex with an insult on the devices that the children use to communicate with them, etc.  These behaviors will hurt you in court, and judges tend to find out about them. A judge will be displeased if you are engaging in behavior to deliberately disparage your ex on communications that you know your child is likely to see. With modern technology, it is easy to show the Court communications between you and your ex.   Remember that if your case goes to trial, judges will see text, e-mail, and social media communications, so make sure that if they’re being used against anyone, they’re being used against your ex!

Peaceful Existence Part II

We’re already separated but have disagreements about parenting time and decision-making.  What can happen? Disagreements about parenting time and decision-making can turn nasty.  Perhaps one parent wants 50/50 custody.  However, the other parent feels that he or she has been the primary caretaker, the parent that has been mostly responsible for the child’s needs daily, and should have primary residential custody.   Perhaps one parent is concerned about the other’s judgment and is unwilling to share equal decision-making authority. At the end of a custody case, there will be an order. What that means is that there will be a document, signed by the judge, with a set of rules about parenting.  These rules generally include: (1) how major decisions are made (discussed further in detail below), and (2) when each parent sees the children.  These orders come about in two ways: (1) by agreement between the parents, and (2) after a trial, where the parents present witnesses and evidence (photographs, text messages, e-mails, etc.) to show the judge why the court should adopt their respective positions.  For example, a parent who is seeking sole legal custody (the sole power to make decisions regarding their children’s upbringing) will present evidence that it would be impossible for them to co-parent effectively.  A parent seeking a shared residential custody arrangement will present evidence that it is possible for each parent to have the child in their care about fifty percent of the time.  Custody trials are very time-consuming, stressful, unpleasant, and expensive, both financially and emotionally. Even if you are already in court, that does not mean that you will go to trial.  Judges almost always try to help parents reach a resolution, even if it takes time. Some parents come to agreements when the trial has already started. An experienced family law attorney can help you to negotiate a custody order that is in your best interest, and more importantly, in the best interests of your children. Of course, there are cases where it is necessary to go to trial and fight for custody. However, remember this: Your custody order is not a grade for how either of you is as a parent.  Rather, it is simply a set of guidelines, usually one that can be modified, for how your children will be parented after you, the parents, separate.   Most jurists are more concerned about what is practical for the children than what is “fair” for the parents. The most hotly contested are cases where there is abuse or neglect, where one parent simply has no relationship with the children, or when one parent simply does not want the other to have a relationship with the children at all.   Where there is abuse or neglect, it is necessary to fight to protect the children from the abusive and/or neglectful parent.  Where one parent has no relationship with the children, usually due to long-term absence, then it is necessary to rebuild the relationship before the children spend more time with the parent than they are emotionally ready for.  Where one parent does not want the other to have a relationship with the children, and there are no legitimate safety concerns preventing the children from having a meaningful relationship with both parents, then the parent who is being kept away should fight to remain in the children’s lives. More commonly, where there is a dispute about who should be the primary residential custodian, the parents disagree about who the primary caretaker was (or whether there was one at all).  Each parent may feel that he or she was the primary caretaker and therefore should have more time with the children.  One parent may feel that the other kept him or her from spending time with the children, and wants at least equal parenting time, to be able to have the relationship that he or she feels deprived of. The court system is designed to find rational solutions to emotional situations. Therefore, if you go to court, you may be surprised to find how little patience the courts have for the emotions that go into disputes about parenting time.  As alluded to earlier in this chapter, the court will be focused upon what is practical, and less on what the parents believe is fair. This does not mean that you should give up or be a doormat.  Rather, what it means is that the way to resolve issues regarding a parenting time schedule is to focus more on what makes sense for your children, and less on what you feel that you (or the other parent, for that matter), deserves. It is a common scene during custody litigation to see a parent seek substantial overnight parenting time, only for the other parent to ask, “Where was he (or she) when our child was sick?  He (or she) never wanted to be involved in parenting before.”  To the party’s frustration, unless there is serious reason to believe that substantial overnight parenting time would be against the child’s best interest, the court’s response is usually, “That was then.   This is now.  Now, he (or she) wants to be more involved.  Wouldn’t that be good for your child?” In most cases, where both parents are fit parents, establishing a parenting time schedule is a relatively simple process, when emotions are taken out of the equation and the parents focus upon practicalities. This is far easier said than done, because realistically, these issues come up when people are emotional.  An experienced family law attorney can guide you through the process, and establish a parenting time schedule that promotes your well-being, the well-being of your children, and minimizes the risk of future custody litigation. Unlike the issue of parenting time, where there are countless options for establishing a schedule, there are fewer options available for deciding decision-making authority, or legal custody. The different options regarding legal custody are: Sole custody: Where one parent makes decisions regarding the children, and the children live with that parent. Joint custody: Usually refers to circumstances where the parents share decision-making authority, but the children live mostly with one parent. Shared custody: (Sometimes referred to as “joint legal and residential custody”) Where the parents share decision-making authority, and the children spend equal time with both parents. First, you may be asking what decisions are involved in questions of legal custody.  Legal custody does not allow a parent to decide when the other one sees the children.   Rather, that is determined by the parenting time schedule.  It does not mean that the parent with legal custody can move the children far away from the other parent despite the existence of a parenting time schedule.   ( See the chapter on relocation.)   Also, it does not mean that the parent with legal custody can control day-to-day issues when the children are with the other parent, like whether the children can play before they do their homework. Legal custody pertains to major decisions. Examples include: Major medical decisions, like whether the children will have surgery (which everyone hopes never comes to pass), Major educational decisions, like where the children attend school, and whether the children will be evaluated for/receive special education services, Religious decisions (often discussed separately in custody orders), and Decisions regarding extracurricular activities.  (Custody orders often state that neither parent can enroll children in activities during the other’s parenting time unless the parents agree.) Custody orders can also include rules about other issues, like who decides where the children attend camp, and decisions regarding mental health treatment for the children. Attorneys often tell clients in custody cases that to have joint custody, the parents need to get along enough to make decisions together.  This is true.   However, even if the parents have communication issues, it is still possible to establish a joint custody order with appropriate guardrails.  Examples include: Giving one parent final decision-making authority in case of disagreement Example: Let’s say that the parents disagree on where a child will attend middle school.  The parents are expected to discuss the issue and try to come to an agreement.   However, if they cannot agree, then one parent gets to make the final decision. Agreeing to defer to third party professionals in case of disagreement Example: Let’s say that the parents disagree about whether a child should have surgery.  They are expected to discuss the issue and try to come to an agreement.  However, if they cannot, they agree to follow the advice of the child’s pediatrician. Use of a parenting coordinator A parenting coordinator is a qualified person, usually a mental health professional or an attorney, appointed by the court to help the parents to resolve issues.   In many court orders where a parenting coordinator is appointed, the parenting coordinator is given decision-making authority where the parents cannot come to an agreement regarding major decisions. Even in cases where a parent is given sole custody, the other parent is almost always given equal access to school and medical records, and school and medical professionals. The other parent can therefore be involved in the children’s lives and development. Disputes involving legal custody and parenting time can be excruciating.  Even though they are intensely emotional for the parents, the decisions ultimately must be based upon logic and practicality.  While often challenging, the best outcomes arise when the parents can put their anger aside and make decisions with the children’s best interests at the forefront.  An experienced family law attorney can negotiate custody orders that protect their clients and, more importantly, the children.

Peaceful Existence Part I

Living Together Before Divorce With Kids: How to Handle the In-Between Coming home after a long day at work is supposed to provide a sense of sanctuary. But if you are living with a spouse while going through a breakup—especially with children in the house—your home can quickly feel overwhelming, tense, and exhausting. Deciding to end a relationship is difficult enough. Continuing to co-habitate under the same roof while navigating custody, finances, and family dynamics is entirely uncharted territory. At Nivin Law, we frequently help working parents navigate these complex, emotionally taxing transitions. Whether you are wondering "Should I move out before divorce?" or trying to figure out how to manage daily life with your kids in the meantime, here is what you need to consider. 1. What is the Ideal Solution? The smoothest, cleanest way to resolve a separation is to work with experienced legal counsel to establish a formal agreement regarding: A temporary or permanent parenting time schedule (detailing when children are with each parent). Clear guidelines for child support and financial responsibilities. Once an agreement is finalized, separating households becomes much easier. However, legal agreements take time. If you cannot come to terms immediately, you need a strategic roadmap for the interim period. 2. If We Can’t Agree, Should I Move Out? A common question clients ask us at Nivin Law is: "Should I move out of the house during a separation?" The honest answer is: It depends. Moving out of the marital home carries significant legal consequences, particularly regarding child custody: Custody Implications: If you move out and leave the children behind, you may inadvertently make it more difficult to secure primary custody later. Additionally, a court may view an unprompted move as a disruption to the children's routine. Financial Obligations: Moving out can immediately obligate you to pay child support and, in some cases, spousal maintenance (alimony), while still managing your own separate living expenses. Property Division: If your goal is to keep the marital home in the final settlement, moving out can complicate that process. The Golden Rule: Under no circumstances should you or your children remain in a living situation that puts your physical or emotional safety at risk. Safety always overrides legal strategy. 3. How to Co-Habitate Peacefully While Separating f you and your partner are trying to reach an agreement but it is taking time, many families adopt temporary in-house separation strategies to protect their mental health and provide stability for the kids: Establish Physical Boundaries: If possible, sleep in separate rooms and designate personal spaces. Create a Temporary Parenting Schedule: Even under the same roof, outline a routine. For example, alternate weekend responsibilities or split weekdays so each parent gets dedicated one-on-one time with the children. Practice Flexibility and Common Sense: If it is your designated parenting evening, but the children walk into the kitchen and see the other parent eating breakfast, it is not "breaking the rules" for everyone to sit together. Shared moments of normalcy do not jeopardize your custody rights. Above all, remember that grace, goodwill, and common sense are vital during emotionally charged times. Looking Ahead Co-habitating before a divorce is a deeply uncomfortable, awkward, and emotionally draining phase of life. But you do not have to figure it out alone. If you need guidance tailored to your specific family situation, reach out to Nivin Law to discuss your options. Once the legal dust settles and permanent arrangements are put in place, there is a clear light at the end of the tunnel.